What to know about the bump stocks Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 vote that the federal ban on bump stocks is legal. Bump stocks are devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire at a rate similar to automatic weapons. The court's decision upholds a 2018 law passed by Congress that banned bump stocks. The majority opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, stated that bump stocks are not protected by the Second Amendment because they allow a semi-automatic firearm to function in a way that is similar to an automatic firearm. The dissent, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, argued that bump stocks are simply a way to improve the accuracy of a semi-automatic firearm and do not make it more deadly. The ruling is a major victory for gun control advocates, who have long argued that bump stocks are dangerous and should be banned. The decision is also a setback for gun rights groups, who have argued that the ban on bump stocks is unconstitutional. This case was brought by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a trade association that represents the firearms industry. The group argued that the ban on bump stocks was an overreach of government power and that it violated the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. However, the court rejected these arguments, ruling that the ban on bump stocks was a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to regulate firearms. The court's decision in this case is likely to have a significant impact on the future of gun control in the United States. The ruling could embolden Congress to pass further gun control measures, and it could also lead to more lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of gun laws.

Summary

"The Supreme Court ruling on bump stocks is a significant development in the ongoing debate over gun control in the United States. The decision is likely to have a significant impact on the future of gun control legislation and litigation."